Weather Underground API Changes

  • 1
  • Announcement
  • Updated 1 week ago
Weather Underground as part of The Weather Company, an IBM business, now offers a series of Data Packages that tap into the breadth and depth of weather data to provide current and forecast conditions, seasonal and sub-seasonal forecasts, lifestyle indices, severe weather and historical weather data. With The Weather Company, you can take advantage of these packages quickly and easily, accessing weather data APIs via the Cloud. The packages are curated to give you only what you need in the format you need it. You can Incorporate weather data into your applications or  combine business data with weather data such as alerts and notifications, forecast data, and weather imagery, then apply advanced analytics to build the foundation for informed enterprise decision-making. Learn more 

To improve our services and enhance the relationship with our users, we will no longer  provide free weather API keys as part of our program.  If you have been directed to download our Weather Underground free API key by a third party provider, please contact your vendor for resolution.
Photo of Tim Roche

Tim Roche, Official Rep

  • 330 Posts
  • 36 Reply Likes

Posted 8 months ago

  • 1
Photo of walid walid

walid walid

  • 4 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Hi
I normally have people who have received the api weather key
me personally yes I have a key of API weather
https://appsync.biz/dafont/ , https://appsync.biz/123movies/ , https://appsync.biz/filehippo/
(Edited)
Photo of Kevin Key

Kevin Key

  • 14 Posts
  • 10 Reply Likes
Wow. IBM sure knows how to alienate their customers. Not only do I send my station data to Weather Underground, but I'm also a paying member for their ad-free service. As of sometime this morning, my access to the website  was revoked without any warning or explanation. This is no way to run a business!
Photo of Victoria Gardner

Victoria Gardner, Official Rep

  • 256 Posts
  • 41 Reply Likes
Kevin, "access was revoked" -- I am guessing that you're referring to the "premium" web service not letting you log in, showing ads, something like that?  Because it has nothing at all to do with you personally.  I was experiencing the same thing on my home computer this morning.  I haven't had a chance to go over to the web site of things to see if it has been reported/fixed yet.  But rest assured it's just a normal bug, and not related to anything else.  

Victoria Gardner
victoria.gardner.ibm.com
Photo of Ralph Williams

Ralph Williams

  • 4 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
I'm the one that paid for the weather equipment to make it work so I could use it with my smart home and alexa that's it I was willing to buy the part and let WU use it for getting the api just for me to find out I spent the money for nothing. U stopped giving the api 1 week after I got it setup. Now u want me to pay 850.00 to ask alexa what's my weather while u use it for free. Are u crazy. Seems like most people here feel the same. What would u do if everyone just stop and only giving u a week notice. Luckily Acurite made the own app to do what I needed.
Photo of Victoria Gardner

Victoria Gardner, Official Rep

  • 258 Posts
  • 41 Reply Likes
Ralph, I don't understand.

If you are a PWS owner who uploader their data to WU, then you will be able to A) continue to use the current API past December 31, while we continue building the new API, and B) use the new API when it is ready.

Are you saying that you just missed getting the key for the old API?  Email me directly if you really want to program everything twice.  The new API will not have identical calls, and the reason we stopped giving new keys was because we did not want people having to write code for the old API and then just do it again for the new API.  If you want to do that, let me know.

So far as I know, no one has suggested that any PWS owner pay $850 (to IBM?) for data.  I don't know where that's coming from, but it's not correct.  

It sounds like you're happy with your current set-up, but if not, my email is below.

Victoria Gardner
victoria.gardner@ibm.com
Photo of Scott Grayban

Scott Grayban

  • 19 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
All my stations have stopped sharing data to WU/TWC/IBM as of today. I also removed WU all Android apps.
I sincerely hope others here will follow and get others to stop their sharing.

Good luck and bye bye asshat IBM

Long Live weeWX

Photo of Victoria Gardner

Victoria Gardner, Official Rep

  • 262 Posts
  • 43 Reply Likes
Bye, Scott.  I wish you all the best in your future endeavors.

Victoria Gardner
victoria.gardner@ibm.com
Photo of Scott Grayban

Scott Grayban

  • 19 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
Just a FYI.... Heard of SmartThings Hub from Samsung ??? They have millions of users and this broke everyone's home automation and weather info needed to run apps and/or set modes.

And SmartThings had an agreement with the new owners that our SmartThings hub would not be affected by this API change.... LIARS

This is the worse thing TWC/IBM has done. Why ????? Do they hate everyone that much ???
Photo of Victoria Gardner

Victoria Gardner, Official Rep

  • 262 Posts
  • 43 Reply Likes
Checking -- this was NOT planned.

--Victoria
Photo of Victoria Gardner

Victoria Gardner, Official Rep

  • 262 Posts
  • 43 Reply Likes
Everything is working.  Anyone who has something not working should NOT assume that it's because the API is not working.  Because it is.

--Victoria
victoria.gardner@ibm.com
Photo of skolia

skolia

  • 21 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
Well we assumed it wasn't working because we all got a notice that it was shutting down on 12/31/2018.   So is it or not?    I've already moved on to Aeris Weather because IBM can't seem to figure out what to do or how to organize a smooth transition.     The communication with Wunderground users (and PWS operators) has been nothing short of appalling.
Photo of James Anding

James Anding

  • 72 Posts
  • 56 Reply Likes
You're going to like Aeris. Their support is world class if you even need it.
I also moved to them because of horrible support from WU.
Have fun.
Photo of skolia

skolia

  • 21 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
I have already worked with their support as I've had to re-write my scripts (and rethink some things with data handling). 

 The only big disappointment is the lack of Normal/Record temperatures but I realized I have 3 years of Wunderground's "almanac" API already in my database so I just made my own almanac table and I can figure the records out by checking the airport temps.
Photo of John Wade

John Wade

  • 16 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
IBM nothing but pure greed.......
Photo of Andy Rowson

Andy Rowson

  • 26 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
Hi Victoria,
There appears to be one hell of a lot confusion over the Wunderground API services and what is available, what, if anything is going to stop working, what will no longer be free etc. etc.

Please can you provide some clarification. I think what we need to know (or I do personally) is the following.

For those API users who
1) Upload data from their PWS on a regular basis to Wunderground
2) Had access to the free API prior to any announcement that it may stop
3) Who do so purely for non-profit purposes, like myself, who use it on a purely personal interest basis, as information for my weather website

Will they still have free access to the Wunderground API so they may continue to download data as they have done before?

If not, will there be any API services available in return for providing Wunderground with free data and images from our PWS's?

Many Thanks
Andy

Photo of Brian Valente

Brian Valente

  • 4 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Hi Andy - you and i are in the same boat.

from what I understand this will be available to us once the new API is available.

There doesn't appear to be any clear answer when that will be, and the transition between the two is still lacking details on timing and how similar those APIs will be. Frustrating, but we're told for PWS users, we'll still get access to our data

Brian
Photo of saratogaWX

saratogaWX

  • 7 Posts
  • 15 Reply Likes
The API is not similar enough to the existing WU API.  They've documented it at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eKCnKXI9xnoMGRRzOL1xPCBihNV2rOet08qpE_gArAY/edit#

The existing WU API keys will not work with the Weather.com API.  New keys will be required, but they've not announced a mechanism to obtain new keys nor issued new keys yet.

Photo of Andy Kerekes

Andy Kerekes

  • 13 Posts
  • 12 Reply Likes
I couldn't wait for an answer from whoever runs wu now and moved on to my DarkSky.net API which is running without any errors. You can see my site at www.nicomaparkwx.com am provided an api key since I feed them also.
Photo of James Anding

James Anding

  • 72 Posts
  • 56 Reply Likes
Nice,  Good Job, I did notice an error you might want to look into.

Photo of John Wade

John Wade

  • 16 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Your weather page looks really amazing.......yes I wrote a weather module for the MagicMirror2 project but had to change api providers because this is a NON profit project and people build their own mirrors but I mean come on not having a free service to get data that's given to you is just pure greed......so all WU modules have been ported over to other providers who offer free keys  like Darksky...which is a really good provider.
Photo of guy

guy

  • 13 Posts
  • 13 Reply Likes
Andy, great page!  Your site provides a huge amount of information, and is well managed. 
Photo of Andy Kerekes

Andy Kerekes

  • 13 Posts
  • 12 Reply Likes
Thank You. Took a year or so to get it to work the way I needed it. I learnined alot about the use of different API's. A lot have mentioned here about Aeris Weather that I am looking at and also pwserather.com which I also feed. I have been in a tail spin trying to stay ahead of WU's changes.
(Edited)
Photo of John Wade

John Wade

  • 16 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Well you did a great job and trust me the module I wrote kept on my toes..... having to switch all the data to another provider..  This is just sad.
Photo of Mike Brewer

Mike Brewer

  • 26 Posts
  • 24 Reply Likes
I wonder when IBM will realise that shutting down the WU API (rather than just giving it a facelift) was a bad decision. Probably "too late". I said months ago that this will drive PWS owners away, and it's happening. Even if some puny bare-bones API is provided solely for PWS owners, it still doesn't project a feeling of being a weather community, does it? More of a smoky private gentlemen's club, with only tap water available at the bar.
Photo of skolia

skolia

  • 21 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
I think it's already too late.

I think this PWS owner API is a last minute "uh oh" reaction.   

IBM wants to target large commercial use of weather data (although there's already a well established one mostly catering to the agricultural industry so I don't think they're going to have an easy time), and while disappointing that's their decision to make -- but weather data is greatly enhanced by PWS owners and as they saw data vanishing someone went "oh no, we need to give them free API access" but instead of using what they already have their making a new one, still intending to leave hobbyists that use weather data high and dry.   So I think IBM has made a large tactical error which they will, ultimately, pay for (and absorb - probably selling wunderground to AccuWeather or something).

My own use case for weather data is very minor and specific and while I'm a bit annoyed that now I have to pay for API usage over at Aeris I've re-written my application.   So even if IBM said "we've changed our minds, we're keeping the free API up for PWS owners and hobbyists", it's too late and I'm probably not the only one with that view.    

(BTW, Aeris is in the process of re-writing their PWS site.)

So congrats, IBM, you killed wunderground.





(Edited)
Photo of John Wade

John Wade

  • 16 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
People who do things for other people for free and use very little data and you drive them away.....not a smart choice but then if you look at IBM as a company they've made a TON of bad decisions in the last 20 years or so.....that is why they are no longer a household name.